- How does the plan translate into the actual experience of being in the building?
- How does it translate in section and elevation?
- How is material employed to further the idea?
- How generative was Kahn's approach? Is it more akin to the wholeness of classicism or the contemporary formalisms we engaged in class?
Among the several claims that the books makes about Kahn's buildings that stood out to me was the notion that Kahn's building was not intended to be generative of itself, that is, that Kahn designed the building as a complete whole. (We shall see about that.) It also makes mention of sectional variation that was not apparent to me in looking at the plan in a cursory manner, as a contrast to the deliberate flatness of the annex. The material treatment is another point discussed in the book that adds another layer to my analytical undertaking, as a connection is made between the decision of the new architect to employ smooth concrete and Kahn's use of brick as a homogenizing material. The book points out the fact that Kahn employed smooth concrete in his seminal building, the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth, Texas.
I was hoping to continue working here at Progress Coffee in East Austin across I-35 from Downtown until it is time for me to go to compline choir practice at 7 PM. I will now attempt to finish all my section drawings for studio before I head back to campus to pick up the book at the Architecture Library. The soy white chocolate mocha I have just consumed in tandem with a green-apple-and-brie sandwich was surprisingly nourishing, giving me the impetus to crank out a lot of work this afternoon.
No comments:
Post a Comment